Is the Puff Bar Targeted at Reducing the Addiction Potential of ELECTRIC CIGARETTES?


Is the Puff Bar Targeted at Reducing the Addiction Potential of ELECTRIC CIGARETTES?

Puff Bar is a superb alternative to a traditional ice cream treat because it has none of the cons associated with an ice cream treat. Puff Bar is a simple sweet treat, that makes it a great option to traditional ice cream treats. Puff Bar is manufactured with only natural flavors, so it’s a healthy alternative for those who are watching their diet. Moreover, Puff Bar is easy to create, you can make it normally as you want and never have to prepare the ice cream every time. It’s ideal for kids and for parties because it’s easy to serve.

Puff Bar

Puff Bar is really a relatively new product, that was developed to test people reaction to herbal cigarette alternatives. Whenever we smoke we are exposing ourselves to thousands of chemicals, some are good, some are bad. Puff Bar will not contain any artificial flavors, colors or nicotine and in addition has zero calories. The manufacturers declare that Puff Bar doesn’t really taste like cigarettes because it is made from completely 100 % natural ingredients including fruits, sugar and mint.

One of the biggest issues in public health today is obesity and diet. For this reason many companies are developing products that help people stay trim. The Puff Bar is one of these brilliant products, they are currently marketing them under names like Puff Nosh, Pop Tart and Popcorn Squeeze. The makers of Puff Bar claim that individuals who use their product to lose excess weight can easily do so when they only need to take with you the tiny product. The makers of Puff Bar know that since public health officials have been calling to find out more on the dangers of empty e-cigarette cartridges it’s pretty clear that the public wants to learn about Puff Bar and whether it poses a risk to public health.

By calling their product a “reusable” cartridge they’re in direct violation of the U.S Food and Drug Administration (FDA). In line with the FDA any e-cigarette that contains nicotine must contain an insert which allows one to put it into the mouth area, because of this you can’t put it into your pocket or purse to take it where ever you might go. If the product also has an extinguisher it is also in violation of regulations. The reason being that since there is no ash produced by a puff Bar e Cigarette it is not a valid device to use to refill a preexisting e cigarette with nicotine or even to smoke another one.

Because the maker of Puff Bar realized this their lawyers have sent letters to the companies that produce puff bars claiming that they have marketed their product in podsmall.com a manner that is illegal. Besides sending cease and desist orders from the lawyers have demanded that the manufacturers cease and desist distribution of Puff Bar of Cigarettes and refund customers money. The letters request they no longer make reference to their product as a “smoke machine”. Instead the company’s lawyers have suggested they call it a “tobacco alternative”.

What the legal team has done isn’t entirely surprising. The issue with Puff Bar is that its e Cigarette product is itself a loophole in the law. This is because there is currently no law mandating that electric cigarettes need to include warning labels or advertising. The inclusion of a “smoking alternative” could open up a flood of lawsuits that would be filed by municipalities that wished to charge cigarette companies for introducing another polluting type of tobacco in to the marketplace.

In addition to the possibility of case being filed by municipalities the inclusion of flavored e cigarettes in the marketplace could result in a decrease in the sale of tobacco by non-smokers. Research shows that smokers who are presented with non-tobacco flavored e-cigs are more likely to replace those cigarettes with the ones that contain nicotine. By making tobacco less accessible to young people and to the younger generations, this could substantially reduce the number of people who die from tobacco related illnesses. Also it seems that the addition of the puff bar to a number of tobacco-flavored electric cigarettes could lead smokers to seek out “real” cigarettes and not rely so heavily on an alternative that may not provide them with nicotine.

It appears that the UK government may have a point. There is currently no requirement for tobacco companies to include warning labels on the products nor is there a ban on flavoured tobacco or e-liquid. The thing that these products all have in common is that they will not cause cancer or other diseases. It looks a question of economics that’s being overlooked. A solution just like the puff bar would seem such as a much better way to earn money for tobacco companies because they’re essentially creating products that are more difficult to consume, which in turn implies that fewer people will purchase them.